It didn’t take Fredric Vasseur to realize that strategy had been one of Ferrari’s main flaws when it thought back on the missed possibilities of the 2022 Formula 1 season.
It was a repeating theme throughout the whole campaign, from the high-profile mistakes that ruined its chances of winning at the Monaco Grand Prix to concerns about not starting Charles Leclerc until the very end at Silverstone to the weird intermediate tyre qualification gambit in Brazil.
Fredric Vasseur believed that Ferrari‘s tactical mistakes were sometimes exaggerated. Particularly in light of the fact that the Prancing Horse’s pit wall chats sometimes received more attention than those of other teams on F1‘s international television feed.
Additionally, Fredric Vasseur believed that failures were never solely the result of the top strategy chief making poor judgments since the decisions were always limited by the knowledge that was available at the moment.
So, for instance, a lack of clear information on the slick tire delta in Monaco or composure on the pit wall regarding variable weather at Interlagos were both equally at fault.
Fredric Vasseur is being more optimistic about Ferrari
The thought that something needed to change if Ferrari wasn’t going to blow the opportunity it had last year flew in the face of Binotto’s confidence in the strategy staff.
Therefore, it is evident that strategy will be one of his primary areas of attention with new Ferrari team principal Fredric Vasseur brought on board to assist give Maranello the push it needs to shoot for the title.
However, despite some early predictions that Vasseur may fire his present pit wall team and start over with new hires, it appears that his true strategy is rather different. Vasseur agrees with Binotto that it would be incorrect to attribute all strategy flaws to a single person.
ALSO READ: Guenther Steiner, the Head of Haas F1, Criticizes the FIA’s Handling of the Event
Fredric Vasseur believes that Ferrari’s season-long struggles were caused by deeper issues and that blunders in strategy are frequently the result of infrastructural issues. Therefore, even while he acknowledges that conversations are underway to see how things might be improved, Ferrari’s problem is likely to be solved more via improved procedures than through a change in personnel.
Fredric Vasseur suggests that one explanation is that Ferrari’s communication channels were too convoluted and involved too many points of view. “The main problem on the pit wall”, Fredric Vasseur continued, “is frequent communication and the sheer quantity of participants.”
Fredric Vasseur makes it obvious that it would be improper for him to intervene and drastically alter the technical framework, which is consistent with how he interacts with the other members of the team.
